Section | Semester | Instructor | Time | Location | Course Areas |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | Fall 2012 | Miller, D.A.
|
MW 11-12:30 | 300 Wheeler |
course reader; Barthes, Roland: S/Z; Poe, Edgar Allan: Poetry and Tales; Poe, Edgar Allen: Essays and Reviews
Rear Window (Hitchcock); Blow Up (Antonioni)
Here are the main things we experience from within the reading practice scapegoated as “too close.” The first is that it is worse than useless: the futility, the irrelevance of its mountainous molehills demoralizes us all the more profoundly as the question “what is the point of such excessive attention?” invariably triggers the far more broadly discouraging question “what is the point of anything?” And the second thing we feel is that this same spirit-killing practice is nonetheless irresistible, as if getting too close to the text we are reading were a compulsion hard-wired into the activity, at whatever chosen range, of reading itself. Too-close reading cannot, then, be plausibly quarantined as the nonsensical luxury of tenured literature professors, or a mere (now obsolescent) phase in literary studies; it is the necessary liability of even the commonest reader, who, sooner or later, is fated to fall into the practice of what we rightly call “reading to death.” For it is with a certain death that too-close reading seems to threaten us: the death not just of the so-called life of the text, but also of social utility, psychosexual integrity, and sense-making of any kind. (Perhaps this is also why—in fiction at any rate—the redemption of too-close reading, its conversion into a properly productive reading, typically involves rationalizing an otherwise unaccountable death: the solution of a murder case.)
The course takes up its topic in three distinct observances: first, we read in the literary tradition inaugurated for the modern period by the stories of Edgar Allan Poe, where excessive attention is embraced in all its antisocial pathology and brilliance. Next, we explore the literary-critical tradition of super-close textual analysis also inaugurated by Poe, but continuing in academicized form from Leo Spitzer’s Stylistics to Roland Barthes’ Poststructuralism and De Man’s Deconstruction, to certain critical-writing experiments of our own day. Finally, we look at some too-close reading practices characteristic of 21st-century mass culture: fandom, 24/7 “crisis” news coverage, etc.
Please read the paragraph on page 2 of the instructions area of this Announcement of Classes for more details about enrolling in or wait-listing for this course.
Please click here for more information about enrollment in English 190.
fall, 2022 |
||
190/1 |
||
190/3 |
||
190/4 |
||
190/5 |
||
190/6 |
Research Seminar: Crisis and Culture: The 1930s, 1970s, and post-2008 in Comparative Perspective |
|
190/7 |
||
190/8 |
||
190/9 |
spring, 2022 |
||
190/1 |
||
190/2 |
||
190/4 |
||
190/5 |
||
190/6 |
||
190/7 |
Research Seminar: Race and Travel: Relative Alterity in Medieval Times and Places |
|
190/8 |
fall, 2021 |
||
190/1 |
||
190/2 |
Research Seminar: Literature on Trial: Romanticism, Law, Justice |
|
190/3 |
||
190/5 |
||
190/8 |
||
190/10 |
||
190/11 |
spring, 2021 |
||
190/1 |
Research Seminar: Literary Collaboration: Samuel Coleridge and William and Dorothy Wordsworth |
|
190/2 |
||
190/3 |
||
190/4 |
||
190/5 |
||
190/6 |
Research Seminar: Black Postcolonial Cultures: Real and Imagined Spaces |
|
190/7 |
||
190/8 |
||
190/9 |