UC Berkeley English Lecturer Magdalena Ostas' "What We Are in Literature and Art," Published

September 10, 2025

UC Berkeley English is delighted to announce the publication of Lecturer Magdalena Ostas' new book, What We Are in Literature and Art. We offer our congratulations to Ostas on the publication of the book, which, "proceeds with sensitive questioning, treating works of art as sites of thinking, not examples of theories," and is a "testament to the continued value of synthetic sweep even—especially—in an age of narrow scholarly specialization." (Ben Roth, Emerson College).

"What We Are in Literature and Art begins from a simple observation: literature and art hand us complex material evidence of the experience of people. This is not a mystical, naive, or hopelessly old-fashioned claim about aesthetic works. The experience that literature and art let us touch, to be sure, is wildly and irreducibly complex. But it is an important idea that creative works like poems, novels, plays, paintings, and photographs give us evidence of the lives of persons. They ask: What are we?

This book considers how aesthetic works pose this longest-standing question and become entangled in our philosophical conversations about personhood. It is written for a broad audience interested in the relationship between literature and philosophy. Through sequences of reflective fragments, the book weaves through a diverse constellation of works in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The reflections zigzag through poetry (William Wordsworth to Gwendolyn Brooks), novels (Jane Austen to Virginia Woolf), drama (Henrik Ibsen to Samuel Beckett), visual art (J. M. W. Turner to Jeff Wall), and philosophy (Immanuel Kant to Ludwig Wittgenstein). What We are in Literature and Art is an experiment in philosophical reading." - Palgrave Macmillan Cham

Weaving together meditations on poetry and painting, fiction and philosophy, Ostas writes with elegance and erudition about the “wildly and irreducibly complex” issue of what we as persons are. Like others who have followed the late Wittgenstein and Stanley Cavell, she proceeds with sensitive questioning, treating works of art as sites of thinking, not examples of theories. More academic than Olivia Laing’s work, but not over-fortified with footnotes, What We Are in Literature and Art is testament to the continued value of synthetic sweep even—especially—in an age of narrow scholarly specialization.
Ben Roth (Emerson College)